If you are a job aspirant concentrating on cracking competitive exams, you must go through the recent events occurring worldwide and within the nation. After prelims and mains exam, the candidate is summoned for group discussion and interview where the discussed topic is related to current affairs. You cannot ignore this subject and must devote adequate time and resources to study it in depth. You are not expected to be an expert on every event but have an insight about it and how it impacts the country and your fellow citizens. You must have a holistic and multi-dimensional approach to current affairs and showcase your vision in the interview. You need to give your personal opinion about current affairs with facts and figures to impress the interview panelists.
Inter-State Water Dispute
You can be asked questions about current affairs today relating to 5-technology, vaccination program, sea lines of communication in the Indian Ocean, shifting of earth`s geomagnetic field, and so on. Contentious issues like inter-state water disputes can be a topic for group discussion or interviews. Cauvery water and the Sutlej Yamuna link canal can crop up during group discussion. According to entry 17, the state governments have the legislative power to control irrigation, water storage, hydra power, canal, drainage, and water supply. On the other hand, entry 56 of union lists authorizes the central government to regulate and develop inter-state rivers and canals.
Sec. 497 of IPC
A topic like Sec.497 of IPC could be a subject in the group discussion or asked in the interview. Sec.497 of IPC allows a husband to prosecute a person who committed adultery (sexual intercourse) with his wife, and he could even file a divorce case on the prima facie. However, such right was not given to the wife to prosecute the woman who committed adultery with her husband. More importantly, the section did not empower the wife to take action against the husband for infidelity. The second perspective is that if the copulation occurs between a man and spinster woman with her consent or with a married woman with her husband’s permission, then the man could not be accused of deceitfulness.
The legality of Sec.497 of IPC was challenged in the Supreme Court by petitioner Joseph Shine. The bench headed by then Chief Justice of India Deepak Misra declared the section unconstitutional and was void.
The court viewed the section as based on gender inequality, violating Articles 14 and 15 of the
Indian Constitution. The court also observed adultery could be termed as a criminal offense if one of the spouses commits suicide in events. The living spouse would be accused of abatement to suicide u/s 306 of IPC in such a situation. The judgment was hailed across the society, and many women activists viewed it as instrumental to ending patriarchal control. Today, you need deep knowledge about current affairs today to excel in group discussion and put your informed views before the interview panelist. Study serious topics which have a profound impact on society and the environment.